The final judgment that has gained the power of judgment may become wrong, especially since the judge is human and makes mistakes, and here the legal truth intersects with the actual truth, so we are facing a big problem, which is: It is not logical that we do not have a solution. In this regard, the legislator opened a window to enter the field of justice by appealing the final criminal judgment. It is considered one of the exceptional means of appeal and guarantees of achieving justice. This paper deals with ways to challenge peremptory penal rulings, bearing in mind that these judicial rulings are subject to the principle of legal stability of rulings. The principle is that the rulings that obtain the final degree become a title of the truth and it is not permissible to present them to the judiciary again, which prompts us to ask about ways to correct these rulings.